December 4, 2022
Sr #PlanModel Name – byYears in effectGoal-EffectContemporary SituationTarget %Achieved %
1IHarrod Domar1951

56
Agri/Gandhian

Lot of dams came up (hirakud);

Community Dev. Prog. (CDP)
After effects of WW II,

Partition,

Constitutional Amendments
2.13.6
2IIFeldman-PC Mahalonobis1956

61
Industrial Dev.

Many Steel Plants came up; Russia helped in.
4.54.1
3IIIPC Mahalonobis1961

66
Employment; Self Sufficient

Green Revolution; Devaluation of currency.
War with China;

War with Pakistan
5.62.5
4HolidayAnnual Plans1966

69
Due to two wars!
5IVDR Gadgil1969

74
Growth with StabilityHeavy oil Price;

Nationalization of Banks
5.73.3
6VTribal- PC Dhar1974

79
20.program;

Hyperinflation
1975- National Emergency;4.45.0
7VIAfter the Rolling Plan of 1979-801980

85
Garibi Hatao;

Minimum Needs Programme
Family Planning5.25.4
8VII1985

89
Infrastructure; Jawahar Rojgar YojanaHigh Oil Price + High borrowing => High Fiscal deficit.55.8
9HolidayAnnual Plans1990

92
Forex Deficit
10VIII1992

97
Human Development Index

Literacy Health Income
Post LPG – Economic Industrial Policy; Indicative Planning.5.66.8
11IXGeneral Nature of Indicative Planning1997

02
Industrial Shift

Industries, Agriculture Profit;
Service Sector emerges
Kargil War;


Orissa Cyclone;


South East Asian Crisis
6.55.4
12X2002

07
Monetary Policy and Control

Section & Regional wise Growth
87.6
13XI2007

12
Faster and Inclusive Growth

Eradicate Poverty, unemployment, gender divide, poor-rich divide.
Higher inflation; Low Forex earning due to weakening rupee.99
14XII2012

17
Approach Paper- DraftingApproach Paper- Drafting

By the XII FYP the government was already planning to move from FYP model to a model where new body could plan holistically. This is NITI AAYOG.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related News